It is not about US?
Hint: niche = field
Nietzsche i.e. proper name for our place?
[Update or bold us, with
Wake up and Eat Some Breakfast** posted from draft 12-29-10 and No Label added.*]
*not(just to be clear, I've add one label below and two links re: No Labels, but not re: Aye of Newt. Well maybe another label.)
[** breaking polling]
[twitter liberals? and here and Re:tales?]
[and Lagging Hope?]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query niche. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query niche. Sort by date Show all posts
Monday, December 27, 2010
Friday, January 06, 2012
Neo-Perspectivism
It is hard to say which niche this arises from.**
Neo-Nuanced is one trigger.***
Even if retro actively.
No silver bullet.
(Or Lone Ranger)
(I, II, III, IV, Not nor note.)
(Far From It)
Less embedded:
It is not just to Pop Culture but social engineering.
If that is an aphorism, you have one hint.(ouch)
But Freud and Hitler were both Austrian,
but the latter-day Austrians are economic transcendentalists.*
(Emerson, Niche& Rand?)
Some credit may be due to "Plato Not Prozac."
[Just in.]
***
Notes to Asterisk Readers:
It may help the flow if one reads the asterisks in order and after a full read of this piece, but scrolling over links as one goes will be useful.
* no Emerson
** last link inserted: Maybe way too much of a D'Ribble or G'Ribble?
[Apologies for Neo-Euphemism.]
[Breaking News: Herman Cain will give an "unconventional Endorsement just prior to the South Carolina Primary. (Ctrl F "best" under vent) I hope it is not another one of his tours or projects, but if it is not a third party run or candidate it might be someone from out of the blue if not a write-in. Huntsman or Bachmann also come to mind.]
*** The irony of taxes, GDP and debt. Is it in the charts?
> Previous Post <
Neo-Nuanced is one trigger.***
Even if retro actively.
No silver bullet.
(Or Lone Ranger)
(I, II, III, IV, Not nor note.)
(Far From It)
Less embedded:
It is not just to Pop Culture but social engineering.
If that is an aphorism, you have one hint.(ouch)
But Freud and Hitler were both Austrian,
but the latter-day Austrians are economic transcendentalists.*
(Emerson, Niche& Rand?)
Some credit may be due to "Plato Not Prozac."
[Just in.]
***
Notes to Asterisk Readers:
It may help the flow if one reads the asterisks in order and after a full read of this piece, but scrolling over links as one goes will be useful.
* no Emerson
** last link inserted: Maybe way too much of a D'Ribble or G'Ribble?
[Apologies for Neo-Euphemism.]
[Breaking News: Herman Cain will give an "unconventional Endorsement just prior to the South Carolina Primary. (Ctrl F "best" under vent) I hope it is not another one of his tours or projects, but if it is not a third party run or candidate it might be someone from out of the blue if not a write-in. Huntsman or Bachmann also come to mind.]
*** The irony of taxes, GDP and debt. Is it in the charts?
> Previous Post <
Sunday, January 08, 2012
A Shot in the Arm?
A collegue recently commented on the difficulty or the desire to be objective. This nails perspectivism on the head, or is it the cross? From neo-perspectivism through neo-nuanced and neo-platonic we do have a dynamic*** of global balance. More sorting later*. Thus spoke Niche?
* 1-9-12 correction (not two Chinas: two perspectives.)
BTW: Thus spoke Adam Smith.
D'Ribble[!] Which came first the crossroad or the chicken?**
Henwood/More? More's the Pity?
[On the other arm, a nemesis may have stubbed a tow(sic) on the plank the nail sticks out of.]
[Speaking of Ice, Thom Hartmann is in Iceland and provides some of the neo-perspectivism.]
** 1-10-12 link added (plural)
*** also maybe plural(see Hartmann/neo-relativism?) dynamics?
[edit notes: Ctrl F "the cart"]
[Also Ctrl F "Descartes" and the four horsemen?]
[Note: I have been lax in my boldness of links as an aid to navigation or sense of the thread. In that regard I finally bolded two.< now 3(!) > Also my asterisks and [brackets] are time relative or sensitive. i.e. to flow of the read. Now I will also note the relative flow of neo-platonic, neo-perspectivism, neo-liberal, neo-con, neo-nuanced and neo-relativism, not to end with six, name names or Ctrl F. BTW: Excuse me if I don't go to the trouble of flip-flopping the tetrahedron, that is the point.(Ctrl F "the people" and "the constitution".)]
[Speaking of a4 or timing, my 4a brought me another F, if not CF.(Note grammar, numbers, shapes, timing, etc.) F is TBA. Not to mention ? Nor Kidding. In closing (?)(!) Or too close to the 4close or Bane?]
[Third Bane's a charm? i.e. convention, congress, cain ? ]
[Speaking of Bane and Try Angles or Flip Romney and flopping it.
BTW: Under the Flip link there is an accounting or statistical trick that is not unknown to the debate. I won't play upon it, but it involves the "average tax cut" versus "the middle-income American." It is mathematical hyperbole as well as reasonable, where reality is even more confusing. It is more accurate to say that the richest are paying a lesser per cent of their gross (actual tax rate) than any other income category after the standard deductions and other taxes are accounted for.]
> previous post <
* 1-9-12 correction (not two Chinas: two perspectives.)
BTW: Thus spoke Adam Smith.
D'Ribble[!] Which came first the crossroad or the chicken?**
Henwood/More? More's the Pity?
[On the other arm, a nemesis may have stubbed a tow(sic) on the plank the nail sticks out of.]
[Speaking of Ice, Thom Hartmann is in Iceland and provides some of the neo-perspectivism.]
** 1-10-12 link added (plural)
*** also maybe plural(see Hartmann/neo-relativism?) dynamics?
[edit notes: Ctrl F "the cart"]
[Also Ctrl F "Descartes" and the four horsemen?]
[Speaking of a4 or timing, my 4a brought me another F, if not CF.(Note grammar, numbers, shapes, timing, etc.) F is TBA. Not to mention ? Nor Kidding. In closing (?)(!) Or too close to the 4close or Bane?]
[Third Bane's a charm? i.e. convention, congress, cain ? ]
[Speaking of Bane and Try Angles or Flip Romney and flopping it.
BTW: Under the Flip link there is an accounting or statistical trick that is not unknown to the debate. I won't play upon it, but it involves the "average tax cut" versus "the middle-income American." It is mathematical hyperbole as well as reasonable, where reality is even more confusing. It is more accurate to say that the richest are paying a lesser per cent of their gross (actual tax rate) than any other income category after the standard deductions and other taxes are accounted for.]
> previous post <
Thursday, January 16, 2014
escapement?
While thinking about the type of people who can take a watch apart and put it back together again, I thought... I've never done that. But in thinking about the mechanics of it, I may have recalled
something in regards to the nature of pendulums, springs and gears. The term "escapement" came up in regard to clocks on the History Channel. That aside I may not get around to taking a clock apart, let alone following up* on the particulars of what I will now put together, but it feels** similar.
How Many Ways Can Maureen Dowd Embarrass Journalism? by Charles Pierce Esquire**
Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot against democracy: Meet the “12 Percent Solution” by Paul Rosenberg ***
P versus NP problem wikipedia with credit to Elementary
The Secular Coalition and Religious Freedom Day.
* 1-17-13 added 2 inserts based on heading alone, and added labels
** (indicating read) Journal** about Journalism and Humor (Manichean Duelity) (Hegel tine Identity?)
*** only begun tofight(I mean read)(OW)^
Note: there are 3(**) but only one Mani[!] (buh dump ump)(ow)
^ 1-19-14: Before I go further. (bdu)
to reads: Personally I do not think Edward Snowden is a whistle-blower, nor is the debate over. Nor is the last read yet connected to the second to last, but maybe to the further and the branching problem.
something in regards to the nature of pendulums, springs and gears. The term "escapement" came up in regard to clocks on the History Channel. That aside I may not get around to taking a clock apart, let alone following up* on the particulars of what I will now put together, but it feels** similar.
How Many Ways Can Maureen Dowd Embarrass Journalism? by Charles Pierce Esquire**
Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot against democracy: Meet the “12 Percent Solution” by Paul Rosenberg ***
P versus NP problem wikipedia with credit to Elementary
The Secular Coalition and Religious Freedom Day.
* 1-17-13 added 2 inserts based on heading alone, and added labels
** (indicating read) Journal** about Journalism and Humor (Manichean Duelity) (Hegel tine Identity?)
*** only begun to
Note: there are 3(**) but only one Mani[!] (buh dump ump)(ow)
to reads: Personally I do not think Edward Snowden is a whistle-blower, nor is the debate over. Nor is the last read yet connected to the second to last, but maybe to the further and the branching problem.
Friday, August 06, 2010
Niche
Where there is a why, there is a how.
The end does not justify the means.
Twilight of the models.
[I should leave this "as is", but I will continue a rant, (the link was only an after google.)]
Dennis Preager recently paraphrased Nietzsche, and G.W. Bush earlier refudiated* Machiavelli. If the end were to justify the means, what justifies the end? No pun on the variations of mean(etc.) but...[I hate to leave this rhetorical**, but...]
* actually?
** see "circular" in context(not to mention values/price/cost equations)
The end does not justify the means.
Twilight of the models.
[I should leave this "as is", but I will continue a rant, (the link was only an after google.)]
Dennis Preager recently paraphrased Nietzsche, and G.W. Bush earlier refudiated* Machiavelli. If the end were to justify the means, what justifies the end? No pun on the variations of mean(etc.) but...[I hate to leave this rhetorical**, but...]
* actually?
** see "circular" in context(not to mention values/price/cost equations)
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Coordinary
What^ is life?
An *un-coordinary* chemical relationship with the environment with potential to replicate itself and adapt to change or find a niche but not without risk of changing it[!]
* "It's alive." ... actually this asterisk expresses a nature(RNA)^^ of sorts[?] to the evolution of purpose. In the original intent two asterisks bracket (to be continued)... the word. The missing link revolves around the magazine Philosophy Now and a Philosophy of History con text.
^ 1-13-14 apologies for not noticing subscription requirement.
^^ related news to be updated
*no* not that it came from Mars, but that it is not fully read yet or linked.
Speaking of not fully red.
OW !
OW!! ^^^ Frau Neitzsche **
** There is no^^^ !!
O W ? ! c-red?
Hint: *asymmetrical underlining?* ... knot to insult or dis-pare(or re-pair)age. {?}
Alternate aphorism? Art is Litter Ally chemical.
An *un-coordinary* chemical relationship with the environment with potential to replicate itself and adapt to change or find a niche but not without risk of changing it[!]
* "It's alive." ... actually this asterisk expresses a nature(RNA)
*no* not that it came from Mars, but that it is not fully read yet or linked.
 |
| Phosphat-Ion.svg |
 |
| Phosphate-3D-balls.png |
 |
| Space filling? |
Speaking of not fully red.
OW !
** There is no
O W ? ! c-red?
Hint: *asymmetrical underlining?* ... knot to insult or dis-pare(or re-pair)age. {?}
Alternate aphorism? Art is Litter Ally chemical.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Update
Somewhere I may have noted that Herman Cain said he would have a surprise before the South Carolina primaries. I haven't found that reference, but I wonder if this was it.
Speaking of Updates.
Not to mention Martin Bashir and Heads Examined. Tea Party Nation leader endorses candidate who literally* in his own words, needs his head examined. Who wants anybody to be on food stamps? Certainly not the president. The Gingrich claim that Obama is the "food stamp president" while coming close to being... [1-24-12: I chose to break mid-semantics as to the truth of claims. Judson Philips quote: "if you want someone to be on food stamps you really ought have your head examined" yet Gingrich thinks that is what Obama wants.** If you think the NAACP should demand pay checks not food stamps, what does that make you? That is what Gingrich charged them with.]
*1-24-12 in con text m/un-con science links/break
[?]
[To be read: Ryan Lizza The New Yorker, The Obama Memos.]
[1-27-12]
Tuesday, January 01, 2013
(fn)TOO Point OH[!]
FOOTNOTE PAGE TWO: January 2013
note placement date v. time stamp
(bold and unbold)
1-3-13 that is the quest : place holder 4 (sc), BLANK NETWORK(sc), Who got the memo?(sc), Educat or, New York Times(sc), Safire Proved Urban Legend Monger(sc)
HECUVA TANGENT
1-3-13 Spare Me (SC): (b.s.) "Tales" of sorts[^] :
Re: Leads(?), A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the News Stand , Not to make light... (), Niche for our Nietzsche() , Tails Aside (), The Real Deal() , Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (sc) (7?)
1-7-13 Foot in mouth? Means Trumps Meaning, but can't read memos. , Try-Mentionalism ?[!] , Snooki? , "a royal huff" , The Alter of Tax Cuts ?
1-11-13 SNAP (sic) i.e. [!] or spell check double check AKA unintended CAD? Root cause? CapTenseLog[!] running in draft.
1-14-13 nor link or punt?
Waking up to a New Year. // Ghost of X-mas Passed. , The other ground game...
1-16-13 [1] off law and lalaland?
Memories...or Excusing Pre-quashing (sc) the FeeNix? , "buying a stairway" , Oh Sasha! , Running Joke
NPR [!]
Thursday, January 06, 2011
Follow-up
And post insert.[Update]
Old Digs: Slate on Health Reform
Case Study:
If his crime is so clear he should be prosecuted, but that is part of the problem. Part of the constitution involves treaties being the law of the land. I did not get into the particulars of his charges but his treatment is possibly a violation as well. If his intent or principle was to be a whistle blower for international crimes, he should have been more select, not that he would not have to face justice just the same. The likely reason he can't face justice is our country can't face justice. So I am saying that even if he thought he had principles he should not have done what he did. And even if he does, he must face trial, but then there is the difficulty of exposing more by allowing him a defense and having to defend the country. So I do not willy nilly and neither do the PsySR expect that there not be standard treatment for traitors,(which it seems has been gone beyond) but if this is it, then that is another exposure and point of my so called Case Study...Justice and American Exceptionalism.
A calling of Blues and Jazz?
Under the QCON this is a ramble of sorts and news. There is a common thread in the contact of the tangent being others only lightly referenced or embedded.
P.S. A particular charge(PC?) that one side makes is that the otherside has not read bills. I posit two concerns. Have they read the bill? Of course it is valid that they do not have the time sometimes. But why not at least mention what they have issue with. This of course this is especially related to the second link in this post. I will not be reading all of these things, but we can sometimes let others be our filters.
[BREAKING: Not to Lampoon*, but up on READING?]
*no pun intended but this just in my INBOX and upon reading makes it back to the P.S.[and just prior...an update]
[There is more than a Ribble run through this, and it is not just Dialogue or Dialectic, nor wordplay intended, but it seams** American Exceptionalism.]
** see Labels
[In a less uniting manner Thom Hartmann comes through again, not that there is anything wrong. But he does correct a name and give some party history.***]
*** Thom has altered his course in regard to pronouncing Boehner's name despite the principle it was founded on, Bane or Democratic Republic. It is interesting that Jefferson and Lincoln are involved in the history of party name changes. BTW: would it be too far fetched to call the No Labels Party, the Platonic Party? It is not really a party, but then it might be the latest niche in the evolution. I came to this in a reflective(read bounce) way. Would it be right to call them The Republic Party?
Old Digs: Slate on Health Reform
Case Study:
If his crime is so clear he should be prosecuted, but that is part of the problem. Part of the constitution involves treaties being the law of the land. I did not get into the particulars of his charges but his treatment is possibly a violation as well. If his intent or principle was to be a whistle blower for international crimes, he should have been more select, not that he would not have to face justice just the same. The likely reason he can't face justice is our country can't face justice. So I am saying that even if he thought he had principles he should not have done what he did. And even if he does, he must face trial, but then there is the difficulty of exposing more by allowing him a defense and having to defend the country. So I do not willy nilly and neither do the PsySR expect that there not be standard treatment for traitors,(which it seems has been gone beyond) but if this is it, then that is another exposure and point of my so called Case Study...Justice and American Exceptionalism.
A calling of Blues and Jazz?
Under the QCON this is a ramble of sorts and news. There is a common thread in the contact of the tangent being others only lightly referenced or embedded.
P.S. A particular charge(PC?) that one side makes is that the otherside has not read bills. I posit two concerns. Have they read the bill? Of course it is valid that they do not have the time sometimes. But why not at least mention what they have issue with. This of course this is especially related to the second link in this post. I will not be reading all of these things, but we can sometimes let others be our filters.
[BREAKING: Not to Lampoon*, but up on READING?]
*no pun intended but this just in my INBOX and upon reading makes it back to the P.S.[and just prior...an update]
[There is more than a Ribble run through this, and it is not just Dialogue or Dialectic, nor wordplay intended, but it seams** American Exceptionalism.]
** see Labels
[In a less uniting manner Thom Hartmann comes through again, not that there is anything wrong. But he does correct a name and give some party history.***]
*** Thom has altered his course in regard to pronouncing Boehner's name despite the principle it was founded on, Bane or Democratic Republic. It is interesting that Jefferson and Lincoln are involved in the history of party name changes. BTW: would it be too far fetched to call the No Labels Party, the Platonic Party? It is not really a party, but then it might be the latest niche in the evolution. I came to this in a reflective(read bounce) way. Would it be right to call them The Republic Party?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)